{{Short description|English polymath (1794–1866)}} {{Redirect|Whewell}} {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}} {{Use British English|date=March 2012}} {{Infobox officeholder | honorific_prefix = [[The Reverend]] | honorific_suffix = {{Post-nominals|country=GBR|FRS|FGS|FRSE|size=100%}} | image = Portrait of W. Whewell; stipple engraving Wellcome L0014766.jpg | order = 27th | title = Master of [[Trinity College, Cambridge]] | term_start = 1841 | term_end = 1866 | predecessor = [[Christopher Wordsworth (divine)|Christopher Wordsworth]] | successor = [[William Hepworth Thompson]] | birth_date = {{Birth date|1794|05|24|df=yes}} | birth_place = [[Lancaster, Lancashire|Lancaster]], England | death_date = {{Death date and age|1866|03|06|1794|05|24|df=yes}} | death_place = [[Cambridge]], England | spouse = {{Plain list| * {{Marriage|Cordelia Marshall|1841|1855|end=died}} * {{Marriage|Everina Ellis|1858|1865|end=died}} }} | alma_mater = {{Tree list}} * [[University of Cambridge]] ** [[Trinity College, Cambridge|Trinity College]] {{Tree list/end}} | known_for = {{Plain list| * Coining the terms ''[[scientist]]'' (1833) and ''[[physicist]]'' (1840) * Coining the terms ''[[anode]]'' and ''[[cathode]]'' (1834) }} | awards = {{Plain list| * [[Chancellor's Gold Medal]] (1814) * [[Smith's Prize]] (1816) * [[Royal Medal]] (1837) }} {{Infobox academic | embed = yes | discipline = {{Hlist|[[Mathematics]]|[[philosophy]]|[[science]]|[[theology]]}} | work_institutions = University of Cambridge (1817–1866) | main_interests = {{Hlist|[[History of science]]|[[poetry]]}} | academic_advisors = [[John Gough (natural philosopher)|John Gough]]{{Cite web |title=William Whewell – Biography |url=https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Whewell/ |access-date=2025-07-19 |website=Maths History |language=en}} | notable_students = [[Augustus De Morgan]] }} }} '''William Whewell''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|h|juː|əl}} {{respell|HEW|əl}}; 24 May 1794{{snd}}6 March 1866) was an English [[polymath]]. He was Master of [[Trinity College, Cambridge]]. In his time as a student there, he achieved distinction in both [[poetry]] and [[mathematics]]. The breadth of Whewell's endeavours is his most remarkable feature. In a time of increasing specialisation, Whewell belonged in an earlier era when [[natural philosophers]] investigated widely. He published work in [[mechanics]], [[physics]], [[geology]], [[astronomy]], and [[economics]], while also composing [[poetry]], writing a [[Bridgewater Treatise]], translating the works of [[Goethe]], and writing [[sermon]]s and [[Theology|theological]] tracts. In mathematics, Whewell introduced what is now called the [[Whewell equation]], defining the shape of a curve without reference to an arbitrarily chosen coordinate system. He also organized thousands of volunteers internationally to study [[ocean tides]], in what is now considered one of the first [[citizen science]] projects. He received the [[Royal Medal]] for this work in 1837.{{Cite book|last1=Cooper|first1=Caren|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7wCxDQAAQBAJ&pg=PP3|title=Citizen Science: How Ordinary People are Changing the Face of Discovery|date=20 December 2016|isbn=9781468314144|pages=3–8|publisher=Overlook Press |author-link=Caren Cooper}} One of Whewell's greatest gifts to science was his [[wordsmithing]]. He corresponded with many in his field and helped them come up with [[neologism]]s for their discoveries. Whewell coined, among other terms, scientist,{{Cite book |last=Lewis |first=Christopher |title=Heat and Thermodynamics: A Historical Perspective |publisher=Greenwood Press|year=2007|isbn=978-0-313-33332-3|location=United States of America|pages=95|chapter=Chapter 5: Energy and Entropy: The Birth of Thermodynamics}} [[physicist]], [[linguistics]], [[consilience]], [[catastrophism]], [[Uniformitarianism (science)|uniformitarianism]], and [[astigmatism]];{{cite journal|year=2013|title=Evolution and impact of eye and vision terms in written English |url=http://oculistmd.wordpress.com/article/evolution-and-impact-of-eye-and-vision-terms-in-written-english/|journal=[[JAMA Ophthalmol.|JAMA Ophthalmology]]|volume=131|issue=12|pages=1625–31|doi=10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.917|pmid=24337558|vauthors=Leffler CT, Schwartz SG, Stackhouse R, Davenport B, Spetzler K|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141223122215/http://oculistmd.wordpress.com/article/evolution-and-impact-of-eye-and-vision-terms-in-written-english/|archive-date=2014-12-23|url-access=subscription}} he suggested to [[Michael Faraday]] the terms [[electrode]], [[ion]], [[dielectric]], [[anode]], and [[cathode]].{{cite web|url=http://chimie.scola.ac-paris.fr/sitedechimie/hist_chi/text_origin/faraday/Faraday-electrochem.htm |title=On Electrical Decomposition |year=1834 |access-date=2010-01-17 |publisher=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720203405/http://chimie.scola.ac-paris.fr/sitedechimie/hist_chi/text_origin/faraday/Faraday-electrochem.htm |archive-date=2011-07-20 |url-status=dead |last=Faraday |first=Michael }} In this article Faraday coins the words ''electrode'', ''[[anode]]'', ''[[cathode]]'', ''[[anion]]'', ''[[cation]]'', ''[[electrolyte]]'', and ''[[electrolyze]]''.{{Cite book|last=Baigrie|first=Brian|title=Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective |publisher=Greenwood Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-313-33358-3 |location=United States of America|pages=86|chapter=Chapter 8: Forces and Fields}} ==Early life, education and marriages== Whewell was born in [[Lancaster, Lancashire|Lancaster]], the son of John Whewell and his wife, Elizabeth Bennison.{{cite book|title=Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002|date=July 2006|publisher=The Royal Society of Edinburgh|isbn=978-0-902198-84-5|url=https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp2.pdf|access-date=8 April 2019|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304074135/https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp2.pdf|url-status=dead}} His father was a master [[carpenter]], and wished him to follow his trade, but William's success in [[mathematics]] at [[Lancaster Royal Grammar School]] and [[Heversham Grammar School|Heversham]] [[grammar school]] won him an [[exhibition (scholarship)|exhibition]] (a type of scholarship) at [[Trinity College, Cambridge]] in 1812. He was the eldest of seven children, having three brothers and three sisters born after him. Two of the brothers died as infants while the third died in 1812. Two of his sisters married; he corresponded with them in his career as a student and then a professor. His mother died in 1807, when Whewell was 13 years old. His father died in 1816, the year Whewell received his bachelor's degree at Trinity College, but before his most significant professional accomplishments. Whewell married, firstly, in 1841, Cordelia Marshall, daughter of [[John Marshall (industrialist)|John Marshall]]. Within days of his marriage, Whewell was recommended to be master of Trinity College in Cambridge, following [[Christopher Wordsworth (divine)|Christopher Wordsworth]]. Cordelia died in 1855. In 1858, he married again, to Everina Frances (née Ellis), sister of [[Robert Leslie Ellis]] and widow of [[Affleck baronets|Sir Gilbert Affleck, 5th Baronet]].{{Citation |last=Stray |first=Christopher |chapter=From Bath to Cambridge: The Early Life and Education of Robert Leslie Ellis |date=2022 |title=A Prodigy of Universal Genius: Robert Leslie Ellis, 1817-1859 |volume=55 |page=6 |editor-last=Verburgt |editor-first=Lukas M. |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-85258-0_1 |access-date=2025-02-04 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-85258-0_1 |isbn=978-3-030-85257-3 |quote=Fanny (Everina Frances), the eldest child, was born in 1807 and the last to die, in 1865, the year before her second husband William Whewell, Master of Trinity. |doi-access=free|url-access=subscription }}{{cite ODNB |id=29200|first=Richard|last=Yeo|title=Whewell, William}} She died in 1865. He had no children. ==Career== [[File:W Whewell slnsw.jpg|thumb|Portrait of William Whewell, c. 1863]] In 1814, he was awarded the [[Chancellor's Gold Medal]] for poetry.{{Citation|title=A Complete Collection of the English Poems which Have Obtained the Chancellor's Gold Medal in the University of Cambridge |publisher=W. Metcalfe |location=Cambridge|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gw6GyHofIIAC|author=University of Cambridge|year=1859}} He was [[Second Wrangler]] in 1816, President of the [[Cambridge Union Society]] in 1817, became fellow and tutor of his college. He was professor of [[mineralogy]] from 1828 to 1832 and [[Knightbridge Professor of Philosophy]] (then called "moral theology and casuistical divinity") from 1838 to 1855.{{acad|id=WHWL811W|name=Whewell, William}}{{EB1911|inline=y|wstitle=Whewell, William|volume=28|page=587}} During the years as professor of philosophy, in 1841, Whewell succeeded [[Christopher Wordsworth (Trinity)|Christopher Wordsworth]] as master. Whewell influenced the syllabus of the [[Mathematical Tripos]] at Cambridge, which undergraduates studied. He was a proponent of 'mixed mathematics': [[applied mathematics]], [[descriptive geometry]] and [[mathematical physics]], in contrast with [[pure mathematics]]. Under Whewell, analytic topics such as [[elliptical integrals]] were replaced by physical studies of electricity, heat and magnetism. He believed an intuitive geometrical understanding of mathematics, based on Euclid and Newton, was most appropriate.{{cite magazine|title=The Venn Behind the Diagram|last=Verburgt|first=Lukas M.|volume=59|issue=2|date=April 2023|pages=53–55|magazine=Mathematics Today|publisher=[[Institute of Mathematics and its Applications]]}} ==Death and legacy== Whewell died in Cambridge in 1866 as a result of a fall from his horse.GRO Register of Deaths: MAR 1866 3b 353 CAMBRIDGE – William Whewell, aged 71 He was buried in the chapel of Trinity College, Cambridge, whilst his wives are buried together in the [[Mill Road Cemetery, Cambridge]]. A window dedicated to Lady Affleck, his second wife, was installed in her memory in the chancel of [[All Saints' Church, Cambridge]] and made by [[Morris & Co.]] A list of his writings was prepared after his death by [[Isaac Todhunter]] in two volumes, the first being an index of the names of persons with whom Whewell corresponded.{{cite book |first=Isaac |last=Todhunter |author-link=Isaac Todhunter |title=William Whewell: An Account of his Writings, with a selection from his literary and scientific correspondence |location=London |publisher=Macmillan |year=1876 |url=https://archive.org/stream/williamwhewelld01whewgoog#page/n6/mode/2up |volume=1 }}{{cite book |first=Isaac |last=Todhunter |title=William Whewell: An Account of his Writings, with a selection from his literary and scientific correspondence |location =London |publisher=Macmillan |year=1876 |url=https://archive.org/stream/williamwhewelld03whewgoog#page/n6/mode/2up |volume=2 }} Another book was published five years later, as a biography of Whewell's life interspersed with his letters to his father, his sisters, and other correspondence, written and compiled by his niece by marriage, Janet Mary Douglas, called Mrs Stair Douglas on the book's title page.{{cite book |first=Janet Mary |last=Douglas |title=The Life and Selections from the Correspondence of William Whewell, D.D. |location=London |publisher=C. Kegan Paul & Co. |year=1881 |url=https://archive.org/stream/lifeselectionsfr00dougrich#page/n7/mode/2up }} These books are available online in their entirety as part of the Internet Archive. ==Endeavours== ===History and development of science=== [[File:William Whewell.jpg|thumb|right|William Whewell, {{circa|1860s}}]] In 1826 and 1828, Whewell was engaged with [[George Biddell Airy|George Airy]] in conducting experiments in [[Dolcoath mine]] in [[Cornwall]], in order to determine the [[density]] of the earth. Their united labours were unsuccessful, and Whewell did little more in the way of [[experimental science]]. He was the author, however, of an ''Essay on Mineralogical Classification'', published in 1828, and carried out extensive work on the tides.{{cite book |last = Whewell |first= William |title= Essay on Mineralogical Classification and Nomenclature; with tables with the Orders and Species of Minerals |place= Cambridge |publisher= Printed by J. Smith, Printer to the University |year= 1828 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=dloPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PP11 |via= Google Books |accessdate= 21 July 2023}} When Whewell started his work on [[tides]], there was a theory explaining the forces causing the tides, based on the work of [[Isaac Newton|Newton]], [[Daniel Bernoulli|Bernoulli]], and [[Pierre-Simon Laplace|Laplace]]. But this explained the forces, not how tides actually propagated in oceans bounded by continents. There was a series of tidal observations for a few ports, such as [[Port of London|London]] and [[Port of Liverpool|Liverpool]], which allowed tide tables to be produced for these ports. However, the methods used to create such tables, and in some cases the observations, were closely guarded trade secrets. [[Sir John Lubbock, 3rd Baronet|John Lubbock]], a former student of Whewell's, had analysed the available historic data (covering up to 25 years) for several ports to allow tables to be generated on a theoretical basis, publishing the methodology.{{cite journal |last1=Lubbock |first1=John William |title=On the tides in the Port of London |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |date=1831 |volume=121 |pages=379–415 |url=https://archive.org/details/lubbock-1831-philosophicaltra-1221roya}}{{cite journal |last1=Lubbock |first1=John William |title=On the tides |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |date=1837 |volume=127 |pages=97–140 |url=https://archive.org/details/jstor-108092}} This work was supported by [[Francis Beaufort]], [[Hydrographer of the Navy]], and contributed to the publication of the ''Admiralty Tide Tables'' starting in 1833.{{cite book |last1=Friendly |first1=Alfred |title=Beaufort of the Admiralty. The life of Sir Francis Beaufort 1774–1857 |date=1977 |publisher=Random House |location=New York |isbn=0-394-41760-7 |pages=294–295}} Whewell built on Lubbock's work to develop an understanding of tidal patterns around the world that could be used to generate predictions for many locations without the need for long series of tidal observations at each port. This required extensive new observations, initially obtained through an informal network, and later through formal projects enabled by Beaufort at the Admiralty. In the first of these, in June 1834, every Coast Guard station in the United Kingdom recorded the tides every fifteen minutes for two weeks.{{cite book |last1=Reidy |first1=M.S. |title=Tides of History: Ocean Science and Her Majesty's Navy |date=2009 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=9780226709338}}{{rp|169–173}} The second, in June 1835, was an international collaboration, involving Admiralty Surveyors, other Royal Navy and British observers, as well as those from the [[United States]], [[France]], [[Spain]], [[Portugal]], [[Belgium]], [[Denmark]], [[Norway]], and the [[Netherlands]]. Islands, such as the [[Channel Islands]], were particularly interesting, adding important detail of the progress of the tides through the ocean. The Admiralty also provided the resources for data analysis, and J.F. Dessiou, an expert calculator on the Admiralty staff, was in charge of the calculations.{{r|"Reidy"|pages=175–182}} [[File:Whewell tidal chart Britain and Ireland 1836 amphidromic point southern North Sea.jpg|thumb|Part of Whewell's cotidal chart of 1836 showing the predicted no-tide area in the southern North Sea{{cite journal |last1=Whewell |first1=William |title=Researches on the tides, sixth series. On the results of an extensive system of tide observations made on the coasts of Europe and America in June 1835 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |date=1836 |volume=126 |pages=289–341 |url=https://archive.org/details/jstor-108036}}]] Whewell made extensive use of graphical methods, and these became not just ways of displaying results, but tools in the analysis of data.{{r|"Reidy"|page=182}} He published a number of maps showing [[cotidal line]]s (a term coined by himself, but first published by Lubbock, acknowledging the inventor{{r|"Cartwright2000"|pages=111}}{{Cite journal| author=Lubbock, J.W.| year=1832| title=Report on the Tides| journal=Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science| volume=1| pages=194| url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/56234498}}) – lines joining points where high tide occurred at the same time. These allowed a graphical representation of the progression of tidal waves through the ocean. From this, Whewell predicted that there should be a place where there was no tidal rise or fall in the southern part of the North Sea. Such a "no-tide zone" is now called an [[amphidromic point]]. In 1840, the naval surveyor [[William Hewett (died 1840)|William Hewett]] confirmed Whewell's prediction. This involved anchoring his ship, HMS ''Fairy'', and taking repeated soundings at the same location with [[Depth sounding|lead and line]], with precautions needed to allow for irregularities in the [[seabed]] and the effects of tidal flow. The data showed a rise of no more than {{convert|1|foot|m}}, near the limit of accuracy.{{cite journal |last1=Hewett |first1=William |title=Tide observations in the North Sea |journal=The Nautical Magazine |date=1841 |pages=180–183 |url=https://archive.org/details/199-1841-hewett-fairy-the-nautical-magazine-1841}}{{cite book | first1 = David Edgar |last1=Cartwright | date = 17 August 2000 | title = Tides: A Scientific History | edition = | publisher = Cambridge University Press | pages = | isbn = 978-0-521-79746-7 | oclc = 1001932580 }} Whewell published about 20 papers over a period of 20 years on his tidal research. This was his major scientific achievement and an important source for his understanding of the process of scientific enquiry, the subject of one of his major works, ''Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences''. His best-known works are two voluminous books that attempt to systematize the development of the sciences, ''History of the Inductive Sciences'' (1837) and ''The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History'' (1840, 1847, 1858–60). While the ''History'' traced how each branch of the sciences had evolved since antiquity, Whewell viewed the ''Philosophy'' as the "Moral" of the previous work as it sought to extract a [[Universal (metaphysics)|universal]] [[theory of knowledge]] through history. In the latter, he attempted to follow [[Francis Bacon (philosopher)|Francis Bacon]]'s plan for discovery. He examined ideas ("explication of conceptions") and by the "colligation of facts" endeavored to unite these ideas with the facts and so construct science. This colligation is an "act of thought", a mental operation consisting of bringing together a number of empirical facts by "superinducing" upon them a conception which unites the facts and renders them capable of being expressed in general laws.L.J. Snyder, entry: "W. Whewell" in "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Whewell refers to as an example [[Johannes Kepler|Kepler]] and the discovery of the elliptical orbit: the orbit's points were ''colligated'' by the ''conception'' of the ellipse, not by the discovery of new facts. These conceptions are not "innate" (as in Kant), but being the fruits of the "progress of scientific thought (history) are unfolded in clearness and distinctness".W. Whewell "The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History" (1860, 373), London J.W. Parker. ===Whewell's three steps of induction=== Whewell analyzed [[inductive reasoning]] into three steps: * The selection of the (fundamental) idea, such as space, number, cause, or likeness (resemblance); * The formation of the conception, or more special modification of those ideas, as a circle, a uniform force, etc.; and, * The determination of magnitudes. Upon these follow special methods of induction applicable to quantity: the method of curves, the method of means, the method of least squares and the method of residues, and special methods depending on resemblance (to which the transition is made through the law of continuity), such as the method of gradation and the method of natural classification. In ''Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences'' Whewell was the first to use the term "[[consilience]]" to discuss the unification of knowledge between the different branches of learning. ===Opponent of English empiricism=== Here, as in his [[ethics|ethical]] doctrine, Whewell was moved by opposition to contemporary [[Empiricism|English empiricism]]. Following [[Immanuel Kant]], he asserted against [[John Stuart Mill]] the ''[[A priori and a posteriori|a priori]]'' nature of [[Logical truth|necessary truth]], and by his rules for the construction of conceptions he dispensed with the [[Mill's Methods|inductive methods of Mill]]. Yet, according to [[Laura J. Snyder]], "surprisingly, the received view of Whewell's methodology in the 20th century has tended to describe him as an anti-inductivist in the [[Popperian]] mold, that is it is claimed that Whewell endorses a 'conjectures and refutations' view of scientific discovery. Whewell explicitly rejects the hypothetico-deductive claim that hypotheses discovered by non-rational guesswork can be confirmed by consequentialist testing. Whewell explained that new hypotheses are 'collected from the facts' (Philosophy of Inductive Sciences, 1849, 17)".L.J. Snyder, entry: "Whewell" in "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy". In sum, the [[scientific discovery]] is a partly [[Empirical evidence|empirical]] and partly [[Rationality|rational]] process; the "discovery of the conceptions is neither guesswork nor merely a matter of observations", we infer more than we see.W. Whewell "The History of Scientific Ideas", 1858, I, 46, two volumes, London: John W. Parker. ===Whewell's neologisms=== One of Whewell's greatest gifts to science was his wordsmithing. He often corresponded with many in his field and helped them come up with [[neologism|new terms]] for their discoveries. In fact, Whewell came up with the term ''[[scientist]]'' itself in 1833, and it was first published in Whewell's anonymous 1834 review of [[Mary Somerville]]'s ''[[On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences]]'' published in the ''[[Quarterly Review]]''.{{Cite journal| author = Ross, Sydney | year = 1962 | title = Scientist: The story of a word | journal = [[Annals of Science]] | volume = 18 | issue = 2 | pages = 65–85 | doi = 10.1080/00033796200202722| doi-access = free }} To be exact, the person coined the term ''scientist'' was referred to in Whewell 1834 only as "some ingenious gentleman". Ross added a comment that this "some ingenious gentleman" was Whewell himself, without giving the reason for the identification. Ross 1962, p.72. (They had previously been known as "natural philosophers" or "men of science".) ==Work in college administration== [[File:Statue of William Whewell at Trinity College, Cambridge.jpg|thumb|Statue of Whewell by [[Thomas Woolner]] in [[Trinity College Chapel, Cambridge]] ]] Whewell was prominent not only in scientific research and philosophy but also in [[university]] and college administration. His first work, ''An Elementary Treatise on Mechanics'' (1819), cooperated with those of [[George Peacock (mathematician)|George Peacock]] and [[John Herschel]] in reforming the Cambridge method of mathematical teaching. His work and publications also helped influence the recognition of the moral and natural sciences as an integral part of the Cambridge curriculum. In general, however, especially in later years, he opposed reform: he defended the [[tutorial system]], and in a controversy with [[Connop Thirlwall]] (1834), opposed the admission of [[Dissenter]]s; he upheld the clerical fellowship system, the privileged class of "fellow-commoners", and the authority of heads of colleges in university affairs. He opposed the appointment of the University Commission (1850) and wrote two pamphlets (''Remarks'') against the reform of the university (1855). He stood against the scheme of entrusting elections to the members of the senate and instead advocated the use of college funds and the [[subvention]] of scientific and professorial work. He was elected [[Master of Trinity College]], Cambridge in 1841, and retained that position until his death in 1866. The [[Whewell Professorship of International Law]] and the Whewell Scholarships were established through the provisions of his will.{{cite book |title=Statutes and Ordinances of the University of Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2009 |pages=49–50 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JSi0S7aH320C&pg=PA49 |isbn=9780521137454}}William Whewell laid in his will: "an earnest and express injunction on the occupant of this chair that he should make it his aim in all parts of his treatment of the subject, to lay down such rules and suggest such measures as might tend to diminish the evils of war and finally to extinguish war among nations. See {{cite book |title= Whewell Lectures, International Law, A Series of Lectures Delivered before the University of Cambridge, 1887 |last=Maine |first=Henry Sumner |year= 1888 |publisher=John Murray |location=London |edition=1 |page=1 |url=https://archive.org/stream/internationallaw00mainiala#page/n13/mode/2up}} via Internet Archive ==Whewell's interests in architecture== Aside from science, Whewell was also interested in the [[history of architecture]] throughout his life. He is best known for his writings on [[Gothic architecture]], specifically his book, ''Architectural Notes on German Churches'' (first published in 1830). In this work, Whewell established a strict nomenclature for German Gothic churches and developed a theory of stylistic development. His work is associated with the "scientific trend" of architectural writers, along with [[Thomas Rickman]] and [[Robert Willis (architect)|Robert Willis]]. He paid from his own resources for the construction of two new courts of rooms at Trinity College, [[Cambridge]], built in a [[Gothic style]]. The two courts were completed in 1860 and (posthumously) in 1868, and are now collectively named [[Trinity College, Cambridge#Other courts|Whewell's Court]] (in the singular). ==Whewell's works in philosophy and morals== [[File:William Whewell portrait.jpg|thumb|180px|Portrait by [[James Lonsdale (painter)|James Lonsdale]]]] Between 1835 and 1861, Whewell produced various works on the philosophy of [[moral]]s and [[politics]], the chief of which, ''Elements of Morality'', including ''Polity'', was published in 1845. The peculiarity of this work—written from what is known as the [[Intuition (knowledge)|intuitional point of view]]—is its fivefold division of the springs of action and of their objects, of the primary and [[Natural rights and legal rights|universal rights of man]] (personal security, property, contract, family rights, and government), and of the cardinal virtues ([[wikt:benevolence|benevolence]], [[justice]], [[truth]], [[wiktionary:Purity|purity]] and [[Social order|order]]). Among Whewell's other works—too numerous to mention—were popular writings such as: * the third ''[[Bridgewater Treatise]]'', ''Astronomy and General Physics considered with reference to Natural Theology'' (1833), * the two-volume treatise ''The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History'' (1840),''The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=Fe8TAAAAQAAJ&pg=PR1 Volume 1]''The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=Ujg6AAAAMAAJ&pg=PR1 Volume 2] * the essay ''Of the Plurality of Worlds'' (1853), in which he argued against the [[probability]] of [[Extraterrestrial life|life on other planets]], * the ''[[Plato]]nic Dialogues for English Readers'' (1850–1861), * the ''Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy in England'' (1852), * the essay, ''Of a Liberal Education in General, with particular reference to the Leading Studies of the University of Cambridge'' (1845), * the important edition and abridged translation of [[Hugo Grotius]], ''[[De jure belli ac pacis]]'' (1853),''Grotius on the Right of War and Peace, An Abridged Translation by William Whewell'', Cambridge: At the University Press, 1853 [https://archive.org/stream/onrightsofwarpea00grotuoft#page/n7/mode/2up at Internet Archive] and * the edition of the ''Mathematical Works'' of [[Isaac Barrow]] (1860).''The Mathematical Works of Isaac Barrow, D.D., edited for Trinity College by W. Whewell'', Cambridge: At University Press, 1860, [https://archive.org/stream/mathematicalwor00whewgoog#page/n4/mode/2up at Internet Archive] Whewell was one of the Cambridge [[University don|don]]s whom [[Charles Darwin]] met during [[Charles Darwin's education|his education there]], and when Darwin returned from [[Second voyage of HMS Beagle|the ''Beagle'' voyage]] he was directly influenced by Whewell, who persuaded Darwin to become secretary of the [[Geological Society of London]]. The title pages of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'' open with a quotation from Whewell's ''Bridgewater Treatise'' about science founded on a [[natural theology]] of a creator establishing laws:{{Citation | surname = Darwin | given = Charles | author-link = Charles Darwin | year = 1859 | title = On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life | publisher = John Murray | location = London | url = http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373&viewtype=text&pageseq=7 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251018172128/https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373&viewtype=text&pageseq=7 |archive-date=2025-10-18 |url-status=live}}([[The Origin of Species]] page ii.) Retrieved on 5 January 2007
But with regard to the material world, we can at least go so far as this—we can perceive that events are brought about not by insulated interpositions of Divine power, exerted in each particular case, but by the establishment of general laws.Though Darwin used Whewell's concepts as he made and tested his hypotheses regarding the [[theory of evolution]], Whewell did not support Darwin's theory itself. "Whewell also famously opposed the idea of evolution. First, he published a new book, ''Indications of the Creator'', 1845, composed of extracts from his earlier works to counteract the popular anonymous evolutionary work ''Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation''. Later Whewell opposed Darwin's theories of evolution."{{cite web |url=https://victorianweb.org/science/whewell.html |title=William Whewell (1794–1866) gentleman of science |first=John |last=van Wyhe |author-link=John van Wyhe |work=Victorian Web |access-date=21 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251125212154/https://victorianweb.org/science/whewell.html |archive-date=2025-11-25 |url-status=live}} This may be one reason Whewell has become a forgotten figure. As Peter Medawar wrote in '' 'The Art of the Soluble' '' (1967)